I do not believe it is a
distortion or exaggeration to suggest that innovation is the primary survival skill of the
human species. It is man’s mind that
enables him to survive, and innovation is the manner by which we are able to
survive in a broader range of climates than any other species. Consider the brilliant success of humanity
over the past few centuries, and recognize that it has nothing to do with any
physical adaptation.
As a species, we have
overcome most of the threats to our survival and perpetuation. In fact, most of the threats we face in the
present age are things of our own creation: overpopulation, warfare, pollution
and the depletion of resources, and the like.
It is the dark side of our own inventions that has threatened our
existence: steel and gunpowder have made
warfare a more serious threat, industrialization chemicals do great harm to the
environment, agricultural science depletes the land, television stupefies the
mind. The very things created to help
humanity have the greatest potential to harm us, even to render the world unfit
for habitation.
And our success has itself
become a liability. In our boredom, we
find ways to destroy ourselves, through our cultural stagnation, the religious
and political ideologies that put us against one another. The Mayans, Romans, Russians, and British all
built great civilizations that crumbled in the decadence and ennui of people
who had nothing better to do than destroy themselves.
And the America of today
has become so spoiled and decadent that it is has become negligent. Americans enjoy wealthy lives, but produce
little in terms of physical goods – they are dependent on manufacturing operations
overseas and, increasingly, import even engineers and technical workers. Should the American dollar collapse, these
ties will be severed and the nation will lack the facilities and competence to
produce for its own consumption.
If one accepts that creativity
is necessary for human survival, it then follows that our well being hinges on
the ability to generate and implement new creative ideas. It was at one time the academic and commercial
institutions that fueled success – but these institutions have become
destructive of their own ends. The
academy has failed because it no longer serves to encourage new ideas, but to
preserve traditional ways of thinking against new ideas. The commercial sector has always been
focused on profit rather than progress, and when progress threatens profit,
then progress must be halted by any means necessary. As a result, the best products are not always
made, and patents are abused to protect the commercial viability of less
efficient or effective products by ensuring that discoveries that would make
them better are not delivered to the market.
There is also the problem of consumer demand for cheap and convenient solutions that provide immediate satisfaction, without a broader concern. The electric automobile is a solution to one of the greatest causes of pollution that is advancing environmental deterioration – but it costs too much and is inconvenient to charge, so consumers continue using petroleum-powered machinery. Convenience food that is laden with additives and preservatives known to be harmful is still purchased in great quantities because people would rather not take the time and effort to cook.
And both the manufacturer
and consumer are prone to remaining set in their habits until some crisis
compels them to change. Given that
today’s technology is capable of creating crises on a major scale, the damage
may be too great to correct once it has become severe enough to motivate
change.
So what can be expected is
not for western culture to reverse its course, but to continue until it has
destroyed itself, and the cycle will begin again as one of the developing
nations – perhaps Brazil or India – rises to become the new superpower for a
time, until it too becomes weakened by its own decadence and falls to be
replaced by yet another. It seems to
follow in the cycle of history.
No comments:
Post a Comment