It’s been suggested that you learn more about someone at the end
of a relationship than at the beginning.
This is because when forming relationships, people tend to act in a
manner that accommodates the perceived preferences of the other party. In time, they stop acting and settle into
their normal patterns of behavior. And
at the end, they are often at their worst because they no longer care about
making a favorable impression.
Commercial relationships follow much the same pattern:
companies put on their best face to appeal to prospects and convert them into
first-time buyers. Once a purchase is
made, the company settles into “business as usual” and expects the customer to
attend to their needs and preferences.
And when a customer calls to cancel service, things get ugly.
It would be pessimistic to say that this is their “true”
character, as character considers behavior as a whole rather than in specific
situations – but it is certainly fair to say that it is their natural behavior,
in that it reflects the way they are inclined to act when there is not an
external motivator (profit).
This pattern is evident even in organizations that are
applauded for their customer relations.
They are very accommodating when attempting to win business, indifferent
once the contract is signed, and very difficult to work with when a customer
wishes to end the relationship.
And while it is fair to state that businesses should be
motivated by profit, as profit is often the sole reason for the formation of a
commercial organization (though ideally it should be regarded as a by product
of successful operations rather than the primary motive), it remains entirely
short-sighted: it is the difference between a former customer who might return
in future, and one who certainly never will – hence it is in the financial
interest of a firm to maintain its values in every interaction, even
interactions that are financially unfavorable.
No comments:
Post a Comment