The greatest advantage of technology is empowerment: it
enables many people to perform a task in spite of their lack of expertise. This is also the greatest disadvantage of
technology – because while it enables people to do a task, it does not enable
them to do it well.
It’s easy to observe when the results are visual: an
accounting clerk, given a word processing program, can “design” documents. He can lay out a document, choose typefaces
and colors, decorate it with clip-art, and perform other tasks he has no skill
or training at doing – and the result is absolutely hideous and unreadable
because he doesn’t have the skills of a designer.
An in the spirit of fair play, it works both ways: a designer, given a spreadsheet application,
can do accounting work. They can enter
numbers, create categories, and do financial analyses with the software – and
the result is just as awful, wrong, and dangerous to reply upon because he
doesn’t have the skills of an accountant.
A hapless and unskilled worker with sophisticated tools does
not become an expert, nor capable of doing the work of someone with skills and
experience – though their ignorance and narcissism make many of them loath to
admit it. And a lazy or cheap manager,
who does not himself understand or prioritize quality, will provide no
discouragement – and may in fact be very supportive of having “Bob the
Accountant” design the company’s sales brochures because he has the software to
do so. It’s certainly cheaper than
hiring a real designer to do the work.
But take this a step further … the same attitude is taken
toward the customer. If the firm
provides self-service capabilities, the customer can take on tasks that had
previously been performed by skilled (read “expensive”) employees who currently
provide them with service.
This idea, while financially attractive, can only lead to
disaster. Some customers are capable of
self-service, others are not. And it
will become clear which are or are not when they find that self-service does
not lead to the fulfillment of their needs to a degree of quality they find
acceptable.
And customers can be just as narcissistic and ignorant as
employees in this regard: they feel that whatever they did for themselves must
have been done right, and so if there is any dissatisfaction with the outcome,
it is the company they did business with that is to blame. It’s the solution that did not perform the
job adequately, not their lack of expertise in using it, and they will switch
to a different solution provider.
And while the economic efficiency of customer self-service will
continue to attract firms to any prospect of reducing their labor, it must be
done with the consideration that when any cost is saved, the quality of service
is invariably diminished – so follows customer satisfaction, and so follows
market share. There are exceptions to
this rule, of course, but they tend to be rare.
No comments:
Post a Comment