In conducting research into personal finance, an interviewer
asked an odd question to put the interviewee at ease: she asked them to tell
her of their most prized possession – a physical object they had purchased
themselves rather than received as a gift.
It was not intended to be part of the study, just a non-sequitur to put
them at ease and get them confortable talking about personal matters – but the results
were rather interesting.
There was no consensus on the item itself – for one participant
it was a wristwatch, another their car, another had a favorite pair of shoes,
and so on. But there were some common
themes as to why they prized that particular possession:
- It was expensive or difficult to obtain – such that the act of purchasing it felt like a significant personal accomplishment
- It was related to their personal identity – something about owning or using the object was related to a character trait they admired
- They mentioned the brand – without prompting, every person named the brand of the item, and many knew the model name
I’ve meditated on this a while, and have no general
conclusions or prescriptive advice. My
sense is that the qualities that make a given product into a prized possession
occur by happenstance. With the
exception of true luxury brands, no brand seeks to make its product expensive
and difficult to obtain – quite the opposite, in fact – and I do not believe it
is within the power of a marketer to cause a product to correlate to admirable
character traits: they can create this perception through advertising, but it’s
only through ownership and use that the association will be validated.
However, it may help to understand the reason that many brands must struggle, and ultimately fail, to become the prized possessions of their customers. It is highly unlikely that any mass-market product will be expensive or difficult to obtain, and some products have very little chance of being or becoming related to the expression of an essential character trait. The mass-produced staple goods are brands of routine consumption that, while indicative of certain qualities of the product, have no special significance to the consumer - hence they have little chance of ever being regarded as a prized possession.
However, it may help to understand the reason that many brands must struggle, and ultimately fail, to become the prized possessions of their customers. It is highly unlikely that any mass-market product will be expensive or difficult to obtain, and some products have very little chance of being or becoming related to the expression of an essential character trait. The mass-produced staple goods are brands of routine consumption that, while indicative of certain qualities of the product, have no special significance to the consumer - hence they have little chance of ever being regarded as a prized possession.
No comments:
Post a Comment